Recent migration research has recently adopted intersectional approaches by disputing age  categories, Gender, and class, which have long been pivotal  to the study of migrant populations. Despite being the focus of sustained scholarly inquiry, these domains continue to exhibit notable  limitations particularly in areas where migrants navigate conditions of “illegality” and where state authorities frequently respond with various forms of repression, including violence, detention,  stop-and-search practices, and police surveillance. This symposium will thus serve as a platform  for scholars and practitioners to exchange methodological insights into short-range mobility and  to explore innovative approaches to researching migration contexts. Furthermore, it will provide a  critical space to examine how funding agencies shape, influence, and/or potentially limit migration  research agendas.

The Laboratory for the History of Mediterranean Economies and Societies  (HESM) at the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences of Tunis, and  Arab Center for Research and Policy Studies (CAREP) jointly organize an  international Conference on:  Temporary Migration (20th –21st Centuries): Spaces, Regulation, and  Imaginaries

May, 7-8-9, 2026

Argument

Existing databases and bibliographic resources on migration reveal that scholarly inquiry within  the humanities and social sciences has tended to coalesce around two principal areas of focus: the  conditions surrounding migrants’ departure, and the processes of reception and/or exclusion in  host societies. Nevertheless, geographers have been at the forefront of mobility data analysis, the  development of “spatial interaction” related theories and the bridging of spatial domains through  conceptual frameworks such as the migratory field (Simon, 1981) and migratory circulation  (Charef, 1999; Arab, 2009). The multifaceted nature of migration—rooted in the intricate interplay  of economic, social, political, cultural, and ecological factors—is investigated across diverse  temporal and spatial contexts. While they remain challenging, such dimensions are concomitantly examined, given that individual mobility patterns shape both personal trajectories and the  geographies traversed. Hence, mobility is analyzed through both national and transnational lenses  (Rosenthal, 1999; Mabrouk, 2010; De Wenden, 2016; Schmoll, 2020; Ben Khalifa, 2021; Regnard,  2022). Furthermore, migration studies invite critical interrogation of foreign policy frameworks  and societal transformations (De Wenden, 2016; Lacroix, 2023, 2024; Abbondanza, 2024). Within  this discourse, media representations and political rhetoric play a pivotal role in shaping public  opinion by constructing narratives that inform collective imaginaries, often contributing to the  entrenchment of migration within predominantly negative paradigms. The study of human mobility is substantially critical for migratory flows.

Recent migration research has recently adopted intersectional approaches by disputing age  categories (El Miri, 2021; Jamid, 2022; Ait Ben Lmadani, 2020), Gender (Moujoud, 2008; Ait Ben  Lmadani, 2020; Arab, 2018; Schmoll, 2020), and class (Peró, 2014), which have long been pivotal  to the study of migrant populations. Given the prominence of migration in public discourse, media representations are replete with traces of Human mobility offering valuable material for analyzing  social imaginaries (Schor, 1985; Gastaut, 2000; Mills-Affif, 2004; Wihtol de Wenden, 2022).  Despite being the focus of sustained scholarly inquiry, these domains continue to exhibit notable  limitations particularly in areas where migrants navigate conditions of “illegality” and where state authorities frequently respond with various forms of repression, including violence, detention,  stop-and-search practices, and police surveillance. This symposium will thus serve as a platform  for scholars and practitioners to exchange methodological insights into short-range mobility and  to explore innovative approaches to researching migration contexts. Furthermore, it will provide a  critical space to examine how funding agencies shape, influence, and/or potentially limit migration  research agendas.

Temporary migration runs counter to sustainable or long-term settlement projects. One  prominent form is circular migration, characterized by repetitive, temporary movement. The  European Union notably promotes such a model as an alternative to irregular migration and as a  development key driver. Temporary migration spans a multitude of situations, such as seasonal  migration (e.g., Gastarbeiter in Germany) (Arab, 2018; Rass, 2023), student and trainee migration  (Jamid), migration of workers and skilled labor under fixed-term contracts contributing to the  precariousness of migrant labor (Khaled, 2023). Temporary migration has a distinct temporality, characterized primarily by its repetitive nature and, to varying degrees, by precarity and  vulnerability. Further, Political exile (Diaz, 2021; Dulphy, 2021) emerges as a temporary condition  that profoundly shapes the life trajectories of both refugees and their descendants. As Bianchi aptly  states (2005): “To exile oneself is not only to change location but also for consciousness itself to  tend toward exile.” Finally, transit situations also fall within the scope of temporary migration  studies” (Alioua, 2013; Regnard, 2022).

Temporary migration can be approached both as an analytical category and as a set of social  practices (Triandafyllidou, 2022), highlighting the gap between state-imposed administrative  classifications and migrants’ lived experiences. Abdelmalek Sayad recognized the dual nature of  migration: the temporary nature (de jure) and the lasting nature of the immigrant’s stay with “an  intense feeling of the temporary.” which is often accompanied by: “an intense feeling of  provisionality.” Sayad thus posited that the immigrant’s situation: “lends itself, not without  ambiguity, to a dual interpretation: at times, as though to deny the increasingly permanent nature  of migration, one retains only the immigrant’s inherent de jure provisional status.; at other times,  conversely, as if to refute the official identification of the immigrant’s status as temporary. "It has  been rightly emphasized that immigrants increasingly tend to ‘become permanently embedded in  their condition as immigrants, " (Sayad, 1991, p. 14).

A thorough critical examination of temporary migration necessitates a decolonial analytical  lens-- one that questions both the historical and structural continuities of colonial power. This approach calls for the deconstruction of colonial legacies rooted in racialization, securitization,  and in the privileging of certain populations. Analyzing migration temporalities through a  decolonial lens enables us to move beyond multiple forms of ethnocentric simplification and to  expose the enduring links between colonial power relations and postcolonial tensions, both in  border zones and in countries of transit and settlement.

Moreover, the construction of collective memory related to these forms of mobility unfolds within  a rather complex temporality—rooted in the past albeit extending into contemporary political  debates and identity claims. Highlighting the diversity of memories and the contexts in which they  emerge (Teulières et al., 2015) prompts us to focus on the role of temporary migrations in processes  of heritage-making and “désinvisibilisation” of previously marginalized histories. “Rendering  immigration history visible is inextricably intertwined with contemporary migration issues.  Numerous museum and archival exhibitions employ artistic mediums to engage with such  concerns, thereby eliciting diverse critical reflections” (Bertheleu et al., 2018).

Temporary migration operates within a framework of migratory utilitarianism" (Morice, 2001)  embedded in European state policies, which helps explain how migration is shaped according to  labor needs in specific sectors such as tourism and agriculture. Such a Utilitarian migration policy  is underpinned by two guiding core priciples: “Firstly, wherever and whenever relevant and  necessary, and in the appropriate quantity, states will import ‘high-quality’ (skilled or elite  migrants). Secondly, should a need for low- or semi-skilled labor also arise, such labor will be  deliberately confined to a time-limited contractual basis.” (Morice, 2001). Southern neighboring  countries have internalized such a logic in their own migration policies, largely due to the  authoritarian nature of their political regimes.

A system of “precarity competition” (Loiseau, Lasacaux, Mesini, 2024) is thereby implemented  in the employment of foreign labor, particularly evident in cases of Moroccan women recruited  for strawberry harvesting in Huelva (Arab, 2018), migrant labor in tomato farming in southern  Italy (Filhol, 2022), and in seasonal work in arboriculture in the Crau region of France (Mesini,  2022). 

This structurally embedded precarity is further intensified for female migrant workers, whose  labor often sits at the intersection of economic marginalization and gendered vulnerability. Such  is blatantly visible in seasonal migration schemes—such as those involving Moroccan women in  the Spanish strawberry fields —where the temporality of labor is narrowly defined and tightly  controlled, reinforcing an endemic instrumentalization of women’s bodies in service of highly  specific and extractive economic needs (Arab & Azaitraoui, 2024).

Of Further significance, temporary migration is embedded not only within individual  projects but also within family strategies aimed at distributing economic risks and securing  relatively stable income streams amid local economic uncertainties (Stark and Bloom, 1985). The  decision to migrate temporarily is not always the outcome of a preconceived, rational, and stable  plan. Drawing on Howard Becker’s work (1963), particularly his concepts of “life sequences” and  the construction of “deviant careers” (Outsiders), temporary migration is perceived as an evolving contingent process. Migrants typically do not set the duration of their stay beforehand, rather, the  temporality of migration develops through experience, shaped by interactions, emerging  opportunities, and constraints. Motivations to prolong or alter migratory trajectories often arise  retrospectively, I so much as they are informed by accumulated experiences within the host  context.

Focusing on irregular migration highlights a temporality shaped by security policies, which  can obstruct migratory trajectories, result in the detention of migrants, or lead to deportation to  places of origin. The sociology of bifurcations (Grossetti, 2006) underscores the role of  contingency and unpredictability in social trajectories. Migratory engagement, whether regular or irregular, can be triggered by unforeseen events or specific contexts, prompting a reassessment of  initial plans. This perspective encourages viewing temporary migration as an open-ended process,  wherein the duration is not predetermined but shaped by unexpected biographical bifurcations  often linked to personal, economic, or political changes.

Although temporary migration has received comparatively less attention compared to more  permanent forms of migration, it has nevertheless been the subject of extensive individual and  collective reflection (Arab, 2018; Baby-Colin et al., 2017; Donnan, Hastings, et al., 2017; Jacobson  et al., 2022; Regnard, 2022). Several key research trends can be identified as follows:

• Studies on pre-defined mobility projects (e.g., migration of workers and professionals,  as well as students, interns and trainees) whose stays are initially framed by fixed durations.  ∙ Research on refugees whose exile is conditioned by political situations in countries of  origin and transit, as well as by dynamics of inclusion and exclusion in countries of  settlement.
• Work on temporary labor regimes examining how labor needs—particularly in sectors  such as agriculture, tourism, and other seasonal industries—generate circular or short-term  migration flows involving both skilled and unskilled workers.
• Studies of migratory trajectories and their intermediary stages where migrants may  pause temporarily -- either in anticipation of further movement or in strategic response to  security barriers such as border enforcement. Such intermediary stages involve complex  logistical arrangement and are frequently subject to state surveillance of non-nationals.

Since the First World War, states have progressively developed and refined mechanisms for the  identification and control of foreigners, reflecting a broader logic of bureaucratic governance and  surveillance (About, Denis & Torpey, 2005). The intensification of mobility regulation has become  a hallmark of both the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, shaped by the rise of nationalist  ideologies, the consolidation of authoritarian and dictatorial regimes, and the proliferation of  political dissent. Since the late 1990s, the European Union has positioned itself as a central actor  in the externalization of migration governance, extending its regulatory reach beyond its territorial  borders and reshaping mobility dynamics across its peripheries which are transformed into zones  of delegated migration management underpinned by security-oriented logics across the  Mediterranean and in bordering regions, thereby reaffirming restrictive logics that prioritize  containment and deterrence (Balleix, 2022; Billet et al., 2022).

By centering our analysis on the 20th and 21st centuries, this symposium intends to analyze  temporalities of migration through the prism of increasingly institutionalized mechanisms of  control and surveillance. The growing politicization of migration-- alongside sustained violations  of human rights-- calls for a thorough rethinking of how temporal regimes/ temporality shape migratory dynamics.

Within this framework, it is essential to undertake a critical inquiry into the practices of a wide  range of actors—including public institutions, international organizations, and civil society—and  to assess the extent to which these practices are informed and conditioned by the temporalities of  migrants’ presence. Whether oriented toward inclusion, capacity-building, or securitization, such  interventions remain inextricably tied to the temporal frameworks within which mobility is  managed.

Building on this premise, migrants residing on a temporary basis often develop distinct modes of  engagement with host societies, that diverge markedly from those of long-term or permanently  settled populations. Public policies that overlook the provisional nature of certain migratory  trajectories—or that operate within temporal logics misaligned with migrants’ lived experiences  — risk generating ineffective and even counterproductive outcomes.

While the Mediterranean space remains an area of focus in our analysis, we have deliberately  chosen not to be confined to this space alone. This approach allows for a more nuanced  examination of interactions with both neighboring and more distant regions and supports a  comparative framework that sharpens conceptual tools while deepening our understanding of how  temporality shapes public policy, humanitarian and associative interventions, as well as the lived  and outlived experiences of migrants and their families.

During their temporary stays, migrants engage in everyday interactions with individuals who  carry—and reproduce—representations of both the Other and the self. The duration and nature of  these encounters play a crucial role in either reinforcing or deconstructing stereotypical attitudes.  At various stages of their trajectories, migrants meet people from diverse cultural and social  backgrounds, making the temporality of migration a critical lens through which to examine  intercultural relations and the processes through which biases and perceptions are shaped,  challenged, or transformed.

Despite a substantial body of literature on exile, relatively few studies have addressed how  migrants themselves represent the spaces they traverse—particularly through artistic and literary  production. This dimension remains underexplored and warrants closer analytical attention.

It is therefore essential to highlight the adaptive strategies and forms of resilience developed by  migrants themselves as they navigate hostile environments or spaces requiring adjustment to  unfamiliar socio-cultural, economic, and political frameworks. In this regard, the collection of life  narratives and in-depth interviews offers valuable methodological avenues for foregrounding  grassroots perspectives and centering migrant agency in the study of temporary migration. 

Notably, social media platforms have emerged as critical arenas for the performative construction  and negotiation of migrant identities (Djebeil, 2025). These digital spaces constitute rich sites of  temporal representation and offer researchers an increasingly relevant corpus for analyzing  evolving subjectivities and practices of self-representation.

The aim of the symposium is to further scholarly inquiry into the multifaceted dimensions of  temporary migration by reconsidering analytical scales and promoting innovative methodological  approaches rooted in empirical fieldwork and critical engagement with heterogeneous corpora— including archival records, institutional documents, personal testimonies, and diverse media  outputs. Contributors are invited to reflect on the influence of temporary migration on public policy  frameworks, sociocultural representations, and the complex textures of migrants’ lived  experiences.

Key Areas

• Temporary Migration of Workers and professional/ skilled labor migration. ⮚ Migration and Education.
• Living and Surviving within Migration Transit Spaces.
• Exile and Temporality.
• Migrants’ Representation of Temporality.6

Output

• Enhancing the Analytical Framework/ conceptualization of Temporality in the Migratory  Context.
• Fostering intellectual and Scholarly exchange between academics from European  universities and institutions and across the MENA region.”
• Publication of the conference proceedings during the year 2026.

Submission Guidelines

Papers that engage with and address one or more of the following areas of focus are welcome:  

Interested authors are invited to submit original abstracts of 250–350 words, outlining the research  question, data or corpus used, and the adopted methodology.

Submissions must include a brief bio with institutional affiliation, research interests, and key  publications.

Proposals should be submitted by October 5, 2025 to the following addresses: labohesm.carep@gmail.com

Important Dates and Deadlines

• Submission Deadline : Abstracts must be submitted by October 5, 2025.
• Notification of Acceptance: Authors will be notified of the Scientific Committee’s decision by October 20, 2025. 
• Full Paper Submission: Authors of accepted proposals are required to submit the complete text of their presentations by  March 30, 2026.
• Conference Dates: The conference will be held on May 7-8-9, 2026.  

Scientific Committee

Hayet Amamou (University of Tunis), Chadia Arab (CNRS, UMR ESO-Angers), Riadh Ben Khalifa  (University of Tunis), Fatma Chalfouh (University of Tunis), Mohamed Charef (Université Ibn Zohr Agadir), Julius Dihstelhoff, ( Mecam-University of Tunis), Anne Dulphy (Ecole polytechnique), Piero  Dominique Galloro (University of Lorraine), Roméo Gbaguidi (Antonio de Nebrija University, Madrid.),  Sofien Jaballah (University of Sfax), Karim Khaled (CREAD-Algéria), Mehdi Mabrouk (University of  Tunis), Esther Möller ( Marc Bloch Zentrum), Antonio M. Morone ( University of Pavia) ; Khalid  Mouna (Rabat Social Studies Institute), Harouna Mounalaika (Abdou Moumouni University of Niamey),  Fatma Raach (Universitof Tunis elManar) , Antoine Pécoud (Sorbonne Paris North University), Céline  Regnard (Aix-Marseille University).

Organizing Committee

Hayet Amamou, Mehdi Mabrouk, Riadh Ben Khalifa, Fatma Chalfouh, Henda Ghribi, Safouane Trabelsi

Conference Coordinator : Riadh Ben Khalifa

Selected Bibliography

Abbondanza, Gabriele (2024), The Foreign Policy of Irregular Migration Governance State  Security and Migrants’ Insecurity in Italy and Australia, London, Routledge.

About, Ilsen, Denis, Vincent (2010), Histoire de l'identification des personnes, La Découverte,  coll. « Repères Histoire ».

Ait Ben Lmadani, Fatima (2020), La vieillesse illégitime ? : Migrantes marocaines en quête de  reconnaissance sociale ? Casablanca : La Croisée des chemins.

Alioua, Mehdi, (2013). Le Maroc, un carrefour migratoire pour les circulations euro-africaines ?  Hommes & Migrations, 1303(3), 139-145. https://doi.org/10.4000/hommesmigrations.2572. 

Arab, Chadia (2009) Les Aït Ayad. La circulation migratoire des Marocains, entre la France  l’Espagne et l’Italie, Presses universitaires de Rennes.

Arab, Chadia (2018), Dames de fraises, doigts de fée, les invisibles de la migration saisonnière,  Casablanca, En toutes Lettres. 

Azaitraoui, Mustapha & Arab, Chadia (2024) “Silence and intersectional resistance: the  mobilisation of temporary Moroccan temporary migrant women in Spain”. International Journal  of Migration and Border Studies, 8 (1/2), p.56-77.

Baby-Colin et al. ( dir.) (2017), Migrations et temporalités en Méditerranée - les migrations à  l'épreuve du temps, XIXe-XXIe siècle. Les migrations à l'épreuve du temps, XIXème-XXIème siècle,  Paris, Karthala.

Balleix, Corine (2022) Enjeux et défis de la politique migratoire européenne, Paris, Dalloz, 2022. 

Becker, Howard S. (1963), Outsiders : Études de sociologie de la déviance. Paris: Métailié. (Édition  française 1985)

Ben Khalifa, Riadh (2021), Entre deux rives. Itinéraire d’un historien des frontières, Tunis, Sotumédias.

Bertheleu, Hélène, Galloro, Piero et Petitjean, Michaël (2018), « Introduction ». Hommes &  Migrations, 1322(3), 6-7. https://doi.org/10.4000/hommesmigrations.6578

Bianchi, Olivia (2005), « Penser l’exil pour penser l’être », Le Portique . Revue de philosophie et  de sciences humaines, https://doi.org/10.4000/leportique.519

Billet, Carole, Halluin Estelle et Taxil, Bérangère (dir.) (2022), L’accueil des demandeurs d’asile  et des réfugiés aux portes de l’Europe, Paris, Mare & Martin.

Charef, Mohammed (1999) La circulation migratoire marocaine : un pont entre deux rives,  Agadir, Sud Contact.

Charef, Mohammed, Gauthier Catherine, De Tapia Stéphane, Ma Mung Emmanuel, Simon Gildas  (1999), La circulation migratoire marocaine, Poitiers, Migrinter.

Diaz, Delphine (2021) En exil. Les réfugiés en Europe, de la fin du XVIIIe siècle à nos jours, Paris,  Gallimard.

Gebeil, Sophie (2025), La fabrique des mémoires de l’immigration maghrébine sur le web français  de 1999 à 2014, Presses Universitaires de Provence. 

Donnan, Hastings, et al., (ed) (2017), Migrating Borders and Moving Times: Temporality and the  Crossing of Borders in Europe. Manchester University Press. 

Dulphy, Anne (2024) « Les réfugiés républicains espagnols en Algérie ». Entre décolonisation et  guerre froide, édité par Marianne Amar et al., Presses universitaires de Rennes,  https://doi.org/10.4000/12arx.

El Miri, Mustapha (2021), « La migration internationale des jeunes et des mineurs : un désir de «  l’ailleurs » pour se réaliser », in Les enfants migrants à l’école, edited by Maïtena Armagnague,  Claire Cossée, Catherine Mendonça Dias, Isabelle Rigoni, Simona Tersigni. Le Bord De l’Eau,  2021. 

Filhol, Romain (2022) « Travailleurs agricoles migrants et tomates à industrie en Italie du Sud :  les enjeux d’une délocalisation sur place », Carnets de géographes, 16 : DOI :  https://doi.org/10.4000/cdg.8283

Gastaut, Yvan (2000), L’immigration et l’opinion en France sous la Vème République, Paris,  Seuil, 2000.

Grossetti, Michel (2006), Bifurcations : Les sciences sociales face à l’événement, Paris, Éditions  de l’École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales.

Jacobson, Christine, et al (ed.) (2022), Waiting and the Temporalities of Irregular Migration,  London, Routledge, 2022.

Jamid, Hicham, Migrer pour un diplôme : Marocains formés en France entre retour et non-retour,  Préface de Catherine Wihtol de Wenden, Paris, Karthala (A paraître).

Jamid, Hicham (2022), « Les étudiants étrangers en France : des démarches épineuses pour un  accueil en trompe-l’œil ». Dans V. Baby-Collin et F. Souiah. Enfances et jeunesses en migration (p. 351-367). Le Cavalier Bleu. 

John Torpey (2005), L’invention du passeport. Etats, citoyenneté et surveillance, Belin, coll.  « Socio-histoire », Paris.

Karim Khaled (2023), Intelligentsias algériennes. Le double exil, Alger, Editions Koukou.

Lacroix, Thomas (2023), The transnational society: a social theory of croos berder linkages,  Cham, Palgrave Macmillan.

Lacroix, Thomas (2024), The Transnational State: Governing Migratory Circulations (English  Edition), Cham, Palgrave Macmillan.

Loiseau, Gaelle, Lascaux, Anne-Adélaïde, Mesini, Béatrice, (Mai 2024), « Pas de droits pour les  saisonniers étrangers », The Conversation,: https://theconversation.com/les-oublies-de-la-crise agricole-pas-de-droit-de-sejour-pour-les-saisonniers-etrangers-222051

Mabrouk Mehdi (2010) Voiles et sel. Culture, Foyers et organisation de la migration clandestine  en Tunisie, Tunis, Sahar Editions. 

Mésini, Béatrice (2022), « En contrats de saison ou en contrats de mission dans l’arboriculture  méridionale : les droits entachés des travailleurs étrangers ». Revue européenne des migrations  internationales, 38(3), p. 43-66.

Mills-Affif, Édouard (2004), Filmer les immigrés : les représentations audiovisuelles de  l’immigration à la télévision française, Bruxelles, Ed. De Boeck ; Bry-sur-Marne : INA.

Morice, Alain (2001), « choisis, contrôlés, placés » renouveau de l'utilitarisme migratoire.  Vacarme, 14 (1), 56-60. https://doi.org/10.3917/vaca.014.0056.

Moujoud, Nasima, (2008), « Effets de la migration sur les femmes et sur les rapports sociaux de  sexe. Au-delà des visions binaires », Les cahiers du CEDREF, 16 p. 57-79.

Peró Davide, (2014) “Class Politics and Migrants: Collective Action Among New Migrant  Workers in Britain.” Sociology OnlineFirst, March 13: 10.1177/0038038514523519

Rass, Christoph (2023): ‘Gastarbeiter’ – ‘Guest Worker’. Translating a Keyword in Migration  Politics. IMIS Working Paper 17, Institut für Migrationsforschung und Interkulturelle Studien  (IMIS) der Universität Osnabrück. Osnabrück : IMIS.

Regnard, Céline (2022), En transit : les Syriens à Beyrouth, Marseille, Le Havre, New York, 1880- 1914, Paris, Anamosa. 

Rosenthal, Paul André (1999) Les sentiers invisibles. Familles et migrations. France, XIXe siècle,  Paris, Editions de l’EHESS. 

Sayad, Abdelmalek (1991), L’immigration ou le paradoxe de l’altérité. 1. L’illusion du provisoire,  Paris, éditions De Boeck (Bruxelles).

Simon, Gildas (1981) « Réflexions sur la notion de champ migratoire international. » Hommes et  Terres du Nord, Acte du colloque international, Lille, 16, 17, 18, octobre 1980, numéro spécial,  Vol. 1, n 1, p. 85-89. 

Schmoll, Camille (2020), Les damnées de la mer. Femmes et frontières en Méditerranée, Paris,  La découverte. 

Schor, Ralph (1985), L’opinion française et les étrangers 1919-1939, Paris, Publications de la  Sorbonne, 1985. 

Stark, Oded, et David E. Bloom (1985), “The New Economics of Labor Migration.” The American  Economic Review 75 (2) : 173–178.

Teulières, Laure, Hélène Bertheleu, et Marianne Amar, éd. (2015) Mémoires des migrations, temps  de l’histoire. Tours : Presses universitaires François-Rabelais :  https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pufr.13590.

Triandafyllidou, Anna ( éd.) (2022), Temporary Migration: Category of Analysis or Category of  Practice? London : Routledge.

Wihtol de Wenden, Catherine (2016), Migrations. Nouvelle donne, Paris, Maison des Sciences de  l’homme.

Wihtol de Wenden, Catherine (2022), Perception du migrant en France 1870-2022, Paris, CNRS  éditions.

 

Location: 10 rue tanit notre-dame
Tunis, Tunesien (1082 Tunis)

Event format: hybrid event

Keywords: temporary migration, space, regulation, imaginary

Contact person: Henda Ghribi
courriel : henda [dot] carep [at] gmail [dot] com