Social and Labour History News

Vienna, 24 and 25 November, 2025

The annual conference 2025 of the Austrian Society for Exile Studies (öge) is dedicated to the experiences of refugees under the title Love, Sexuality and Intimacy in Exile. It looks at these topics from a historical, current and interdisciplinary perspective and explores emotional, romantic and physical experiences. According to historian Ute Frevert, feelings ultimately motivate action and should therefore be considered as a central category of analysis when we investigate agency in exile.

Love, sexuality and intimacy in exile - historical and current perspectives

“There is, my love, only one place in the world where I feel like I am in my country, and that is in your arms. There I can rest. There I can breathe freely. There I am not afraid to be myself. With you, my love, no matter in which country, I would be in my country.”

With these words, the Viennese actress Hedwig Schlichter, who arrived in Argentina in 1940 after surviving her flight from Austria and later from France, reflected on her “fate as an emigrant”. For many years, Schlichter wrote letters to the man she had met and fallen in love with on the crossing from Bordeaux to Buenos Aires - without ever sending them. The reason for this is not known, nor is the identity of the addressee, and yet this brief outline provides a variety of starting points for research into love, sexuality and intimacy in exile. It raises the question of how intimate relationships could be practiced in the transnational contexts of exile when, according to cultural theorist Lauren Berlant, closeness was a defining element; how sexual desire developed in times of political extremes; how loved ones could offer security alongside all the uncertainties of emigration, build a bridge to the country of origin or contribute to despair and a sense of loss.

The annual conference 2025 of the Austrian Society for Exile Studies (öge) is dedicated to the experiences of refugees under the title Love, Sexuality and Intimacy in Exile. It looks at these topics from a historical, current and interdisciplinary perspective and explores emotional, romantic and physical experiences. According to historian Ute Frevert, feelings ultimately motivate action and should therefore be considered as a central category of analysis when we investigate agency in exile. This was also made clear by Marion Kaplan in her study on Portugal as a transit country, published in 2022. In the flight situation associated with feelings of fear, grief and anger, emotional communities (Barbara Rosenwein) could provide stability and a sense of belonging and form the basis for intimate relationships. Family, (sham) marriages or queer networks were also able to make everyday life in exile easier and open up alternative and empowering options for action. In addition, traditional gender roles often began to falter, as women now often took on the role of the family breadwinner - at least temporarily. At the same time, however, some violent forms of relationships were radicalized in the social isolation of exile, gender hierarchical structures were exacerbated and images of masculinity and femininity as well as emancipative achievements suffered a backlash.

Both historically and in current regimes, sexuality is/was often politically instrumentalized. Lesbian, gay, queer and intersex or transgender people experience/experienced marginalization and are/were persecuted - under National Socialism, in Putin's Russia or in Syria in recent years. But even in supposedly democratic systems, in Poland or the USA, the demand for abortion rights or for legal and social equality for LGBTQIA+ people has repeatedly led to outraged reactions and even violent riots.

Young women were often diagnosed with libidinous sexuality, which allowed Nazi authorities to stigmatize those affected as “asocial” and force them to undergo abortions or forced sterilizations; women in sex work also suffered this fate. In some cases, the sexual violence often experienced in this context ultimately prompted them to go into exile. Sexual, queer-hostile, misogynistic experiences of violence were often linked to anti-Semitic or racist ones, which is why historian Anna Hájková advocates focusing on overlapping and multiple affiliations under the heading “Queering the Holocaust”.

Speaking about love, sexuality and intimacy was not easy, especially in structures of coercion and oppression. The conference therefore examines forms of medialization and representations of these TOPICS as well as methodological approaches to understanding their historical and current significance. What function did letters or diaries have in articulating desire, what codes were used to express “forbidden” sexuality, what gender-specific forms of communication can be identified? How did artistic forms of expression (painting, literature, film, music) serve to talk about love, sexuality and intimacy in exile; which formal, linguistic, motivic and aesthetic references were made?

At its annual conference in 2025, the Austrian Society for Exile Studies (öge) will take an in-depth look at the history and present of love, sexuality and intimacy in exile. It particularly welcomes interdisciplinary contributions that combine approaches from exile studies, women's and gender history, contemporary and cultural history, queer studies, sociology and political science. Political and artistic organizations are also invited to present projects. In addition to contributions on the history of exile under National Socialism and other historical contexts, current perspectives are explicitly encouraged. The call for papers is open geographically and should also provide the opportunity for comparative contributions.

Possible topics
- Experiences of LGBTQIA+ people on the run and their networks in exile
- Queering the Holocaust as a task for exile studies
- The stigma of prostitution: sexual work as economic security in exile or as a survival strategy in the internment camps of refugee countries
- Sexuality and the body in totalitarian systems and in the political discourses of the host countries
- emotional communities - emotional history of exile
- Transnational, familial, romantic or sexual relationships - practices, challenges and opportunities
- Love and intimacy in exile
- Intersectional experiences: Overlaps of discrimination based on gender, sexuality, religion, physical disability, etc.
- Marriages of convenience - coercion or emancipative alternatives to the heterosexual marriage norm?
- New/old gender images and relationship models in the confrontation with the host society
- Forms of medialization and representation: letters, diaries, paintings, films, literature, music

Cooperation partners: Österreichische Exilbibliothek im Literaturhaus Wien, QWien

General information
When: November 24 and 25, 2025
Where: University of Vienna, Sky Lounge
Languages: German and English

Deadlines
Until April 27: Please send abstracts of 200 to 300 words and bio blurbs to office@exilforschung.ac.at
By May 15: Selection of contributions

There is no conference fee. We will try to cover the costs of travel and accommodation.

A publication of selected contributions is planned.

Kontakt

office@exilforschung.ac.at

International conference at Leibniz-Zentrum Moderner Orient, Berlin

November 13-14, 2025

Conveners: Steven Serels & Magdalena Moorthy Kloss

The Red Sea is one of the world’s most enduring arteries of human trafficking. Over the past two decades, scholars have shown that the forced migration of enslaved people played a crucial role in linking the African and Arabian littorals into a complex, multifaceted region. This research has helped reshape the academic study of global slavery, which originally focused narrowly on the transatlantic slave trade and the American plantation system. Scholars working on the Red Sea region, as well as on the broader Indian Ocean world, have challenged the study of global slavery to consider the full range of forms of human bondage that developed under other social, political, and economic conditions. This scholarship has convincingly demonstrated that the binary of slavery-freedom elaborated within the trans-Atlantic context fails to describe dynamics in other parts of the world. Some scholars have even gone so far as to suggest that the terms ‘slavery’ and ‘freedom’ should be replaced with other analytical concepts. For example, Winnebeck et al. have recently proposed using the substitute term ‘asymmetrical dependency,’ which they say “allows for the study of a wide range of societal, group-related, and individual varieties of hierarchization and oppression.”

This international conference seeks to contribute to this ongoing debate by critically examining the concept of ‘freedom’ in the study of slavery and its aftermath in the Red Sea Region.

Building off earlier collaborative initiatives, this conference aims to further consolidate the subfield of Red Sea slavery studies by expanding the scope of inquiry beyond the processes that enslaved people and held them in bondage. Instead, the conference will focus on what happens “afterwards” – i.e. when human bondage ends. In the Red Sea Region, abolition and emancipation have been incompletely implemented. This has had complex ramifications that continue to reverberate at the individual, communal, and societal levels. For individuals, emancipation from slavery was shaped by manifold and often overlapping legal, cultural and religious norms. These at times contradictory norms shaped the position of former slaves and their descendants within the broader community. This was true both while slavery was a state-supported institution and after it was officially prohibited over the course of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Scholars working on other regions have also identified legacies of slavery at the macro-level that persist long after abolition and emancipation. They have proposed that these societies should be studied within a lens of ‘post-slavery’ even after the institution has been formally eradicated.

In the Red Sea Region, this is further complicated by the fact that people continue to be held in bondage, albeit illegally.

We invite contributions that address these processes. Possible topics include, but are not limited to:

• Political, philosophical and religious conceptualizations of ‘freedom’ in the Red Sea region
• European colonial understandings of ‘freedom’ and their impact
• Formal routes to emancipation and their consequences
• Marronage and self-manumission
• The descendants of formerly enslaved people
• The economics of abolition and emancipation
• Social/racialized hierarchies and their links to historical forms of bondage
• The connection between slavery, indentured labour and modern forms of coerced labour in the Red Sea.

This two-day conference will be held at Leibniz-Zentrum Moderner Orient, Berlin. Selected papers will be published in an edited volume. Please submit a title and a 300-400 word abstract for your proposed paper, as well as a brief biographical note (100 word maximum), to steven.serels@zmo.de and magdalena.moorthy-kloss@zmo.de by 1 May 2025.

Contact Email magdalena.moorthy-kloss@zmo.de

Palestine and global resistance to genocide

The Workers of the World journal invites submissions for the upcoming themed issue, Palestine, and global resistance to genocide. The deadline for submissions is May 15, 2025.

Description

Using its incomparably superior military might and US support, the Israeli Army in the service of Netanyahu’s far-right government used retaliation for the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack as a pretext to kill, starve, and forcibly displace Palestinian civilians in Gaza. They destroyed their homes, schools, hospitals, and infrastructure at a scale unprecedented in recent history. According to the Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics (PCBS) about 100,000 Palestinians have left the enclave, 11,000 are missing while more than 55,000 are presumed to have lost their lives. Over the past year, Palestinian life in Gaza, the West Bank, and the Occupied Territories has been upended, and the conflict has bled into Lebanon, Yemen, and Syria with the threat of escalation to Iran ever present. The reaction has been global with Palestine at the forefront of the geopolitical stage. South Africa’s case, which brought Israel before the International Court of Justice, is now being supported by 14 countries, mostly from the global South, accusing Israel of committing the crime of genocide against Palestinians in Gaza.

Despite the horror being inflicted on Gaza, we have seen the continuing inspirational fighting resistance of the Palestinian people, as well as an unprecedented movement of global solidarity with Gaza.

This themed issue invites contributions that explore:

• The path of liberation of the Palestinian people – strategies of the liberation movements
• The implications of the geopolitical realignment and Palestinian liberation.
• An assessment of the global solidarity movement and its significance.
• Global labor and the question of Palestine
• The limits and possibilities of international law in relation to Palestine
• The growth of the BDS movement, challenges, and prospects
• Academic and cultural boycotts of Israel
• The significance of the anti-Zionist Jewish movement, in and out of Israel, and its future
• The complicity of western countries in supporting the genocide and repression of dissent
• How has Palestine shifted domestic, regional, and global politics?

The deadline for submissions is May 15 2025, and should be sent to the Executive Board at workersoftheworld1848@gmail.com

 

Work and the Balkans, special issue of the Études Balkaniques

(scheduled for publication in the second half of 2026)

Editors: Antonis Nasis, PhD candidate in history at EHESS/CETOBaC – University of Crete, and Christos Andrianopoulos, PhD in History and member of the CRH at EHESS

Call for contributions

Work and the Balkans

The concept of work—its meaning and how it is culturally, socially, and historically constructed—varies significantly from one region and society to another. In the context of the Balkans, an area rich in cultural diversity, political complexity, and historical transformations, the notion of work has experienced considerable changes. These shifts have been shaped by various socio-economic systems, from Ottoman rule to socialist regimes and the post-socialist transition to market economies.

This collective volume aims to critically explore and analyse the evolution of conceptions of work within the Balkan context. Authors are invited to reflect on how work has been understood, practised, and experienced in the Balkans across different historical periods and through the lens of social class, gender dynamics, and rural or urban settings. Second, we encourage a critical examination of the Balkan context through the analysis of work in its semantic and historical dimensions and from a broader spatio-temporal perspective. Lastly, we propose to examine work as a representation or an imaginary construct by exploring its connotations across different Balkan languages.

Additionally, we aim to highlight lesser-explored aspects, such as geography and the environment, emphasising the significant variations in the landscape: island territories, mountainous and semi-mountainous regions, plains, coastal cities, and the hinterland. We will also consider the contrast between major urban centres (such as Istanbul) and small villages, examining women’s labour, alongside domestic work, artisanal traditions, and working-class identities in major industrial hubs. Other points of interest include foreign workers (seasonal or otherwise), intellectual labour, work narratives, labour activism (anarchism, syndicalism, and marginal forms of communism), labour reforms, and resistance to these reforms. Finally, we will address the complex issue of forced labour and slavery, which persisted in the Ottoman sphere until the 20th century despite its official abolition.

Historiographical approaches to the Balkans often remain confined to traditional frameworks, failing to clarify whether there is a distinct “Balkan” specificity. Some portray the Ottoman period as a "dark" era, while others view it as a “laboratory” of Westernization or modernisation (especially in the 19th century). National historiographies tend to focus on post-Ottoman emancipation. These approaches frequently position Balkan histories in relation to the so-called “West” within a narrative of progress or its absence.

However, recent historiographical perspectives emphasize the permeability of Balkan societies to modern ideas originating from the West thus challenging interpretations attribute

certain phenomena solely to the region's national or cultural particularities. The Balkans, integrated into global dynamics, have not only absorbed external influences but have also become a hub for producing and disseminating new ideas and challenges, situating the region within broader global transformations.

Our study on labour in the Balkans, which we propose to conduct within the framework of Études Balkaniques, does not seek to oppose these various approaches but rather to re-examine them in light of an issue that has yet to receive systematic analysis. Indeed, labour is rarely regarded as a central focus when studying the Balkan region despite its enduring significance in its societies. Over the years, labour has been explored through multiple lenses: politically (the distinction between socialist and capitalist modes of production), as a tool of oppression (e.g., for political prisoners in Greece), economically (such as the self-management labour model in Yugoslavia), or as a marker of craftsmanship and product quality in popular cultures.

Our goal is to broaden these perspectives and examine whether a specific typology of labour exists in the Balkans beyond rigid categories such as socialism, empires, nations, and war—whether by applying terms used in other contexts, frequently shaped by European or Western societies.

When examining the history of labour in the Balkans, can we truly speak of "industry," "proletariat," "factory," or "modernity," or should we instead consider a distinct form of "archaism" in Balkan labour organisation? What are the various forms of labour organisation—whether scientific or not—across different historical periods and regions in the Balkans? How did the Ottoman state's attempts at centralising production models interact with centrifugal local dynamics in the Balkan provinces? How is labour represented in literature, art, folklore, and popular culture, and what does this reveal about the symbolic value of labour in Balkan societies? To what extent do ethnic, national, linguistic, and religious identities shape labour markets, and how does the latter, in turn, condition the working class? Moreover, do Balkan diasporic movements contribute to the perpetuation of "Balkan" labour practices in regions such as Russia, Ukraine, or Poland? Finally, can contemporary labour and production crises in the Balkans be interpreted as the manifestation of a crisis of a precisely "Balkan" form of labour, or do they reflect the challenges of a global system?

To address these questions, we propose an analysis spanning multiple historical periods, from the 17th century to the present day, and covering an extended geographical space that transcends the traditional geographic and cultural boundaries of the Balkans. This special issue encourages interdisciplinary contributions, welcoming perspectives from all disciplines within the social sciences and humanities, including sociology, anthropology, history, and economics.

The Travail et Balkans volume, scheduled for publication in the second half of 2026, is a peer-reviewed journal available on demand and indexed on the CAIRN platform, ensuring the highest academic standards. https://shs.cairn.info/revue-etudes-balkaniques-cahiers-pierre-belon?la… The editors of this volume are Antonis Nasis, PhD candidate in history at EHESS/CETOBaC – University of Crete (antonios.nasis@ehess.fr), and Christos Andrianopoulos, PhD in History and member of the CRH at EHESS (andriano.paris10@gmail.com).

Articles will be published in French, although a limited number of contributions in English will also be accepted. The average length of articles is 40,000 characters. Abstracts, along with completed participation forms, are expected by April 18, and full articles must be submitted by September 26, 2025. For abstract submissions or further inquiries, please contact workandthebalkans@gmail.com

Education, how, what and for whom?

The Workers of the World journal invites submissions for the upcoming themed issue, Education, what, for whom, how? The deadline for submissions is July 15, 2025.

Education has been at the centre of some of the most important debates in recent years. Words and expressions such as burnout;  students’ mental health pathologies; workers’ “blackout” and inadequate training; teacher shortages; digital “teaching”; have spread to the “common sense” lexicon. In parallel, a new wave of strikes, from Chicago to South Africa, from Amsterdam to Lisbon, has since 2008 put teachers’ struggles i.a. for public education in the forefront of social movements, in what seems to be a trend toward a global response to the degradation of public services in the era of declining capitalism.

As far as the ruling classes are concerned, education is central not only because of its sheer reach in society — more than 1.5 billion students and teachers attend the world’s schools and universities every day, which makes them decisive crucibles for the internalisation of ruling ideologies — but also because of the demands of the labour market in a context of radical transformations in the world of work and, more broadly, in the capitalist mode of production itself. In a number of countries around the world the order of capital drives the relentless modification of curricula to the detriment of scientific and historical-social education, as well as the accelerated marketisation of the sector in line with the velocity of capital accumulation and investment; it promotes digitisation, automation and AI in line with algorithms designed by corporations, as well as increasingly precarious labour relations to make up for teacher shortages (caused, strictly speaking, by low salaries and terrible working conditions). Despite growing xenophobia, capital can’t help but deal with the integration of migrant populations through the educational apparatus, albeit as an industrial reserve army. Faced with such onslaughts, everyday educational practices end up assimilating crucial aspects of bourgeois cultural policies. In this, the liberal view re-signifying multiculturalism as a paradigm of diversity and inclusion without any connection to the material basis of societies prevails. The same applies to the active methodologies that remove the ontological dimension of labour from human agency, as if the profound educational inequalities could be overcome by operative procedures in educational processes.

As far as the working classes are concerned, however, there is an evident deepening of strategic dilemmas, as expressed in critical theories. Teaching workers’ struggles around the world corroborate the generalised dissatisfaction with capital’s proposals. In academia questions are also being asked. However, education progressives are far from a consensus. Amid the liberal educational thinking, some progressive conceptions have adopted a constructivist vision that distances students from work as an educational principle on the basis of its ontological, ethical and political dimensions, as advocated by Vygotsky and his interlocutors. Instead of knowledge mediating with nature and society, capital celebrates so-called “skills” — a subject that is hardly broached by many pedagogical currents. Within dialectical materialist conceptions some have come to support the idea that the meaning of education is disinterested knowledge (not aimed at the unilateral training of the workforce), an education that aims for real universalism, overcoming false liberal universalism and committed to the knowledge and explanation of the totality, always in the process of searching for truth through science, which are central dimensions of public education in the face of dogma and obscurantism. Historical-critical pedagogy rejects educational dualism and stands for integral education: in Marx’s terms, omnilateral. The point is discussing the state of the struggle against commercialisation of education and for the protection of the freedom of teaching at all levels of education.

This dossier aims to address these issues and invites all teachers, struggle collectives, researchers and scientists to reflect critically on education and propose solutions that are both a critical reflection on education and a proposal for transformative action.

The deadline for submissions is July 15, 2025, and should be sent to the Executive Board at workersoftheworld1848@gmail.com

 

Accès libre : https://journals.openedition.org/histoirepolitique/

Contenu:

• Adeline Blaszkiewicz-Maison et Romain Castellesi

Les politiques sociales du travail dans l’Europe contemporaine (France métropolitaine, Angleterre, Italie, XIXe-XXIe siècles) : introduction [Texte intégral] 

Social labour policies in contemporary Europe (mainland France, England, Italy, 19th to 21st centuries): Introduction

• Laure Piguet

Chiffres et politiques sociales. La Société fabienne et les savoirs comme stratégie du socialisme réformiste (1884-1889) [Texte intégral] 

Statistics and Social Policy: The Fabian Society and Knowledge as a Strategy for Reformism (1884-1889)

• Adeline Blaszkiewicz-Maison

L’Organisation internationale du travail et les politiques sociales françaises de l’entre-deux-guerres : histoire d’une ambivalence [Texte intégral] 

The ILO and French social policies during the interwar period: history of an ambivalence

• Léo Rosell

Le rôle des organisations ouvrières dans la fabrique du régime général de la sécurité sociale à la Libération [Texte intégral] 

The role of workers' organisations in the creation of the Social Security system in post-liberation France 

• Alessandro Brizzi

Une entreprise-providence ? Les acteurs de la politique sociale de la Fiat entre collaboration et conflit (années 1920-1960) [Texte intégral] 

The company as a welfare state? The actors of Fiat’s social policy between collaboration and conflict (1920s-1960s)

• Aurélie Andry

La Confédération européenne des syndicats et la fabrique d’une politique sociale européenne (1957-années 1980) [Texte intégral] 

The European Trade Union Confederation and the making of a European social policy, 1957-1980s

• Romain Castellesi

Accompagner le désastre ouvrier : les politiques sociales de la désindustrialisation en France dans le second XXe siècle [Texte intégral] 

Accompanying the workers’ disaster: The social policies of deindustrialization in France since 1945

·  Varia

• Louise Francezon

L’agente Nancy Wake ou la fabrique d’une virago ? Pratiques et sociabilités masculines dans les mondes militaires de la Seconde Guerre mondiale [Texte intégral] 

The Making of a Virago? Nancy Wake and the Gendered Dynamics of Military Sociabilities during the Second World war

• Evelyne Hery-Vielpeau

Le genre de l’orientation : un discours sur « les carrières féminines » en France à l’heure de la scolarisation de masse [Texte intégral] 

The gender of school guidance: a discourse on « women’s careers » in France at the time of mass schooling

 

Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung
Hiroshimastraße 28, 10785 Berlin

Ferdinand Lassalle wurde am 11. April 1825 in Breslau geboren. Der Jurist, politische Organisator und herausragende Redner rief 1863 den Allgemeinen Deutschen Arbeiterverein (ADAV) ins Leben. Eineinhalb Jahrzehnte nach der verlorenen Revolution von 1848/49 nutzte Lassalle das liberaler werdende politische Klima zur Gründung einer eigenständigen Organisation der Arbeiter:innenklasse. „Der Arbeiterstand muss sich als selbstständige politische Partei konstituieren und das allgemeine, gleiche und direkte Wahlrecht zu dem prinzipiellen Losungswort und Banner dieser Partei machen“, wie er es 1863 formulierte.

1875 vereinigte sich der ADAV mit der Sozialdemokratischen Arbeiterpartei in Gotha zur Sozialistischen Arbeiterpartei – seit 1890 die Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands. Der gebürtige Breslauer Jude Ferdinand Lassalle gilt somit als Begründer der deutschen Sozialdemokratie.

Anlässlich seines 200. Geburtstags laden wir ein zum Gespräch über die Bedeutung Lassalles für die Sozialdemokratie in Geschichte und Gegenwart.

https://www.fes.de/geschichte/veranstaltungen/ein-abend-mit-ferdinand-l…

Archiv der Arbeiterjugendbewegung, Oer-Erkenschwick/Germany

Am 15. und 16. August 2025 findet der 5. Forschungsworkshop „Arbeit-Jugend-Bewegung“ statt.

Der Forschungsworkshop »Arbeit-Jugend-Bewegung« geht am 15./16. August 2025 in die fünfte Runde! Erstmalig wird er als Kooperationsveranstaltung des Archivs der Arbeiterjugendbewegung (Oer-Erkenschwick) mit dem Bildungswerk Stenden (Düsseldorf) durchgeführt.

Der Workshop richtet sich an Studierende, Promovierende und Postdocs, die zur Geschichte von Arbeit, Jugend und sozialen Bewegungen seit dem 19. Jahrhundert forschen. Im Mittelpunkt steht der interdisziplinäre Austausch: Teilnehmende haben die Gelegenheit, ihre Forschungsergebnisse zu präsentieren, aktuelle Fragestellungen zu diskutieren, sich zu vernetzen und neue Impulse für ihre wissenschaftliche Arbeit zu erhalten. Die Beiträge werden in der Zeitschrift "Mitteilungen" des Archivs der Arbeiterjugendbewegung veröffentlicht.

Die Teilnahme an dem Workshop sowie die damit verbundenen Kosten für Übernachtung und Verpflegung im Salvador-Allende-Haus, Oer-Erkenschwick, ist kostenfrei, sofern Sie sich bis zum 21. Juli 2025 über den folgenden Anmeldelink registriert haben, ein kurzes Exposé zu Ihrem Forschungsprojekt per E-Mail bei m.daldrup@arbeiterjugend.de eingereicht haben und Ihre Teilnahme von uns bestätigt wurde.

Anmeldung: https://www.bildungswerk-stenden.de/seminarangebot/arbeit-jugend-bewegung-forschungsworkshop-2/

by Michel Cordillot

Quelle est la place occupée par cette association dans l'histoire du mouvement ouvrier en France ? Quelle était l'ambition de ses membres fondateurs ? Dans quel contexte ont-ils réussi à se rassembler ? Mais surtout, qui étaient-ils ?

Historien, professeur émérite de l’université Paris 8 Vincennes – Saint Denis, Michel Cordillot est l’auteur de nombreux ouvrages d’histoire sociale, dont La Commune de Paris (1871), La Sociale en Amérique, Aux origines du socialisme moderne (Éditions de l’Atelier, 2021, 2002 et 2010) ou encore, Eugène Varlin, internationaliste et communard (Spartacus, 2016). Il est également traducteur de l’anglais (Éditions de l’Atelier et Éditions du sous-sol).

https://editionsatelier.com/boutique/accueil/478-la-premiere-internatio…

20-21 November 2025, University of Fribourg (Switzerland)

This conference aims to explore the history of students through their regional, religious, national and international organisations in the second half of the twentieth century. The aim is to examine the student agency through the analysis of their social profile, the forms of material or symbolic compensation for their commitment, and the circulation of knowledge about the economic and social situation of the students.

The history of students has been approached through two overlapping frameworks: chronological and thematic. There is a historiography that covers the long 19th century up to the Second World War, in which historians were mainly interested in this social group through the study of its social characteristics, venues, and rituals - in a word, its identity. The approach used for this period, i.e. to look at the institutions created and governed by students, their ways of identifying themselves and organising their lives, has remained overlooked in the study of student life during the Cold War. For this early period, such methods like comparison (Dubois, 2021; Levsen, 2008) or global, imperial and/or postcolonial history (Laqua, 2011; Löhr, 2021; Legrandjacques, 2021) have proved their worth in studies focused on the early 19th century and could be further analysed in the relation with the post-1945 period. 

When studying the second half of the twentieth century, historians focused mainly on students as a fundamental driving force to explain major social movements, the emergence of a globalised mass culture, especially in the context of the “long 1960s”, or to illustrate the evolution of development policies through scholarship schemes and the growth of academic mobility.

This conference aims to explore the history of students through their regional, religious, national and international organisations in the second half of the twentieth century, using certain approaches generally used for the previous period. The goal is not to scrutinise the official language and organisational structures but the social profile of the students, the forms of material or symbolic reward for their commitment, and the circulation of knowledge about the economic and social situation of the students. While taking into account the geopolitical context of the Cold War and the youth movements of the 1960s, we want to pay more attention to the emergence of the mass university on the one hand and decolonisation on the other. This conference will provide a more precise overview of practices and actions carried out by students, while focusing less on discourse.

We therefore give priority to the papers on:

• East-West or North-South comparison in the history of international and national student organisations;
• The participation of students, through their local, national or international organisations, in ‘development’ policies (literacy campaigns, support for the democratisation of studies);
• Local commitment to global, progressive or reactionary causes (anti-/feminism, anti-/racism, anti-/colonialism, inter-/nationalism). 

The conference focuses on the second half of the twentieth century, but diachronic comparisons, as are sociological approaches to the present with a historical dimension, are also welcome. 

The conference is part of the project From Student Internationalism to Erasmus (funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation and the Czech Science Foundation) whose members form the scientific committee.

Dates and places

Dates: 20-21 November 2025

Place: University of Fribourg (Switzerland)

Submission guidelines

Please send a summary of your paper (up to 500 words) and a short CV to Dr Lidia Lesnykh (lidia.lesnykh@unifr.ch)

by 1 May 2025.

Applicants will be notified on the 1st of June.

Travel and accommodation costs are, in principle, at the participants’ own expense. Where necessary, we will do our best to help colleagues without financial support.

Information: Prof. Matthieu Gillabert (matthieu.gillabert@unifr.ch)

Scientific Committe

• Pr. Matthieu Gillabert, Professor of Contemporary history, University of Fribourg, Switzerland
• Dr. Mikuláš Pešta, Sssistant professor, Institute of World History at the Faculty of Arts, Charles University, Czechia
• Dr. Lidia Lesnykh, Postdoc in Contemporary history, University of Fribourg, Switzerland
• Martin Pácha, Ph.D. candidate, Institute of Czech History at the Faculty of Arts, Charles University, Czechia
• Timothy Schürmann, Ph.D. candidate in Contemporary history, University of Fribourg, Switzerland

Cited works

Dubois Antonin, Organiser les étudiants. Socio-histoire d’un groupe social (Allemagne et France, 1880-1914), Paris, Le pupitre, 2021.

Laqua Daniel (eds.), Internationalism reconfigured: transnational ideas and movements between the World Wars, London, I.B.Tauris, 2011 (International library of twentieth century history 34).

Legrandjacques Sara, Voies étudiantes : pour une histoire globale des mobilités étudiantes en Asie (Inde britannique - Indochine française, années 1850-1940), PhD Dissertation, Paris 1, 2021.

Levsen Sonja, « Constructing Elite Identities: University Students, Military Masculinity and the Consequences of the Great War in Britain and Germany », Past & Present (198), 2008, pp. 147‑183.

Löhr Isabella, Globale Bildungsmobilität 1850-1930: von der Bekehrung der Welt zur globalen studentischen Gemeinschaft, Göttingen, Wallstein Verlag, 2021.

Kramersplein 23 9000 Ghent

Liberas, UGent, the Laboratoire des pratiques et des identités journalistiques (ReSIC-ULB) and CAMille (ULB/KBR) are organizing between 5 and 7 June a three-day international colloquium on the life stories and careers of "forgotten journalists". The history of journalism has often focused on a limited number of famous individuals. Behind these big names are many journalists whose names and work have not made it into the canon. But to capture the full diversity of the journalistic field, these careers and lives need to be recovered. Three particular groups of forgotten media professionals stand out: women journalists, journalists who made an important mark on the media landscape of their colonial and post-colonial societies during periods of (de)colonization, and those who worked in sectors and areas of journalism that are often considered less prestigious. The third category includes forgotten war photographers, for example, as well as invisible news workers such as telegraph and linotype operators.

Both young researchers and established scholars, including several authors with extensive experience in professional journalism, will present new research on the experiences of forgotten journalists in very different geographical and historical contexts from biographical or prosopographical perspectives.  The speakers will take us from a French political exile from the Second French Empire (1852-1870) who took up his pen again in Brussels, to a Belgian nobleman who covered historical events around the world a hundred years later during the early Cold War.

The program includes three keynote lectures: a French-language lecture by Marie-Eve Thérenty (Université de Montpellier III) on women who wrote for the film sections of French newspapers in the interwar period, a lecture by Will Mary (Louisiana State University) on the importance of the workplaces and technical resources available to large groups of news workers, and a lecture by Noah Amir Arjomand (University of California) on the professional particularities and importance of "fixers" in making sense of current-day crises in the Middle East.

The colloquium can take place thanks to the support of the Research Foundation Flanders-FWO and the Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique-FNRS.

The colloquium will take place in the conference room of Liberas in the center of Ghent - (Kramersplein 23).

The full program, with all up-to-date details and information on the speakers and the abstracts of their papers, can be accessed at www.forgottenjournalists2025.eu.

Please check this website for updates as the program can be subject to changes.

If you wish to attend, please register by sending an email to: inschrijven@liberas.eu. Please specify which day(s) of the conference you'd wish to attend.

The registration fee for the full conference is 50 euro (sandwich lunches included). The registration fee for one conference day is 25 euro.

by Laure Pitti

À travers le cas des travailleurs immigrés venus d’Algérie, il s’agit ici de retracer l’histoire, à ce jour peu documentée, de la condition (post)coloniale en terrain usinier dans la France des « Trente Glorieuses ». S’appuyant sur une enquête menée sur l’emblématique usine Renault de Billancourt, ce livre montre comment ces migrants coloniaux en viennent alors à incarner la figure du travailleur immigré et de l’ouvrier subalterne, destiné à le rester. Il révèle comment le recours à une main-d’œuvre coloniale est la condition nécessaire à une expansion industrielle à moindre coût dans les entreprises nationalisées. Par la mise en regard des politiques de main-d’œuvre et des carrières de ces subalternes, l’enquête éclaire les logiques imbriquées de l’exploitation capitaliste et de la domination raciale et dévoile leurs effets sur les trajectoires de cette fraction du groupe ouvrier. À partir de ce cas exemplaire, l’ouvrage constitue une contribution originale à une sociohistoire du capitalisme industriel d’État, au prisme des subalternes et des résistances que ces derniers lui opposent. En étudiant comment ces subalternes politisent leur condition, depuis les mobilisations anticoloniales des années 1950 et la guerre d’indépendance algérienne, jusqu’aux grèves d’OS des années 1968, il met au jour une généalogie de la condition de subalterne et des mobilisations antidiscriminatoires dans la société française d’aujourd’hui. 

https://pur-editions.fr/product/9812/algeriens-au-travail-une-histoire-…

University of Strasbourg, France; 6-7 November 2025

Keynote speakers:
Prof. Jessica Gordon Nembhard (CUNY, New York City), author of Collective Courage: A History of African American Cooperative Economic Thought and Practice, (Philadelphia: Pennsylvania University Press, 2014).

Summary:
Although feminist utopias have been the object of an important body of work especially in the literary field, the specific paradigm of labour within these experiments and imaginaries has received only limited attention. The purpose of this conference is to explore to what extent and in what ways labour (both as a site of oppression and emancipation) serves as a paradigm in feminist utopia-building. 
Utopias in the sphere of labour and their political content, which has sedimented in critical theory on work, are imprinted by the Western patrimony of utopian socialism. Although there has been radical, short-lived and often forgotten feminist influences as well as a matrimony now being highlighted, political constructions of “what labour could become” remain shaped by figures such as Fourier, Owen or Saint-Simon.
Feminist critiques have challenged androcentric definitions of labour, broadening the field to include alternative theoretical frameworks. Despite these critical claims, the historical development of capitalism – with its persistently gendered and racialised division of labour – can be considered as dystopian – a “bad place” – that has led some feminist thinkers to reject the idea of equality in such a context. 
The conference will use utopia for its central function: “confronting the problem of power” through sidelining and introducing “a sense of doubt that shatters the obvious” (Ricoeur). While we firmly acknowledge the need for utopia in critical thinking, we also underline the importance of multiple approaches to emancipatory politics as a compass for utopia-building. As a result, we will accept understandings of utopia both as a reflexive tool for critique and as a heuristic tool for transformation.
Three complementary approaches to utopia-building will be considered: 1. Reorganise labour ; 2. Redefine labour ; 3. Abolish labour

Publication:
We are planning to publish the most relevant and developed papers as an open-access book on the theme of “Feminist Utopias at Work” with a renowned publisher.

Submissions:
The conference welcomes contributions in the social sciences and humanities (sociology, anthropology, critical theory, political and social theory, political science, philosophy etc.), whether on theory or experimental practices. Contributions will investigate the political content and implications of feminist utopias that rethink capitalist relations to labour understood broadly. We will also welcome contributions from a broader array of disciplines, including the literary, historical and economical fields.
Presentations can be given in English or in French.

Submission deadline: 1 June 2025

Guidelines
Please submit an abstract of max. 500 words mentioning your chosen theme (reorganise, redefine, abolish), your preferred language (English or French) and a brief biographical note to Ada Reichhart (wecooperc@gmail.com) with the subject line “Feminist utopias at work” by 1 June 2025. We will notify you of our decision by 1 July 2025.

For any questions regarding the call or the conference, please contact Ada Reichhart (wecooperc@gmail.com).

The conference is organised as part of the ERC Starting Grant project “WE-COOP” (2023-28).

The conference will take place in person at the University of Strasbourg.

There is no participation fee. Recognising the financial challenges some scholars face, we have set up a solidarity fund to support those without institutional resources to join the conference. Please contact Ada Reichhart (wecooperc@gmail.com) for further information.

The Program Committee is excited to announce an extension of the deadline to May 15, 2025, as we work to gather a vibrant collection of panels and papers for what is shaping up to be an exceptional conference experience. We are thrilled about the outstanding guest speakers and the enriching local history programs that will be available to our attendees.

Call for Papers – 2025 Pennsylvania Historical Association Annual Meeting, York Pennsylvania, October 9-11, 2025

Exciting conference highlights include:

• Thursday Evening Opening Plenary: Peter Levy
  Peter Levy, historian and author of The Great Uprising: Race Riots in Urban America during the 1960s and The New Left and Labor in the 1960s, will offer a compelling discussion on the long-lasting impact of racial uprisings and labor movements in shaping the nation’s history.
• Friday Luncheon Speaker: Samantha Dorm
  A York County native and co-founder of the Friends of Lebanon Cemetery, Samantha Dorm has dedicated herself to preserving York’s Black history. Her recent project, Paved Over Prominence, utilizes Augmented Reality to recreate York’s lost Black built environment, ensuring the past remains accessible to future generations.
• Friday Banquet Speaker: Robert Parkinson
  Robert Parkinson, author of The Common Cause: Creating Race and Nation in the American Revolution, Thirteen Clocks: How Race United the Colonies and Made the Declaration of Independence, and Heart of American Darkness: Bewilderment and Horror on the Early Frontier, will offer fresh insights into the intersections of race and revolution in early America.
• Local History Experiences
  The York County History Center will be offering free tours of the Colonial Complex and the new museum to PHA attendees on:
  • Thursday, October 9 | 2:00 – 4:00 PM
  • Saturday, October 11 | 12:00 – 4:00 PM

Call For Papers

The Program Committee for the 2025 annual meeting of the Pennsylvania Historical Association invites proposals that explore the theme of “Rights, Reform, and Protest in the Mid-Atlantic.” As we approach the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, we’ll gather on October 9-11, 2025 in York, Pennsylvania—a city that hosted the Continental Congress during the British occupation of Philadelphia. Our theme encourages a broad examination of how the struggles for rights, reform, and protest have shaped revolutionary change across the history of the region.

From the American Revolution to the present day, the Mid-Atlantic has been a crucible for movements that challenge authority, expand civil liberties, and inspire transformative social change. We invite proposals that consider these movements across all historical eras, focusing on the roles of individuals and communities in advocating for political, economic, and social reforms. This includes, but is not limited to, studies of revolutionary activity during the 18th century, civil rights movements, industrialization and labor protests, suffrage campaigns, environmental advocacy, and other efforts where calls for rights and reform fueled protests and shaped the course of history.

The Program Committee encourages submissions that explore this theme through diverse lenses, including political, social, and cultural history, public policy, legal studies, and other interdisciplinary perspectives. We are particularly interested in sessions that highlight underrepresented voices and examine how various groups in the Mid-Atlantic—whether defined by race, class, gender, sexual orientation, disability, or political affiliation—have used protest and reform to claim rights and challenge systems of power.

In addition to this theme, we welcome submissions on all aspects of Pennsylvania and Mid-Atlantic history. Submissions from all disciplinary backgrounds, including but not limited to history, economic and community development, public policy, sociology, visual culture, and political science, are welcomed. Graduate students are especially encouraged to submit proposals. The PHA also supports student engagement with a research session featuring posters and multimedia projects on all aspects of Mid-Atlantic history.

Submit a Proposal

Full session proposals are preferred, but individual papers will also be considered. All program participants must be members of the PHA at the time of the annual meeting. Deadlines for paper, panel, and roundtable submissions will close on (now) May 15, 2025. We are accepting student poster and multimedia proposals through May 15, 2025.

Contact Information

Dr. Chris Pearl 

Program Chair

Lycoming College

Contact Email pearl@lycoming.edu URL https://pa-history.org/2025/03/cfp-deadline-extended-for-our-annual-meeting-in-…

Conference in Budapest, 6-8 October 2025

This conference aims to foster interdisciplinary dialogue on the historical and political dimensions of infant care, child welfare, and family policies in 20th-century Hungary. The conference will examine the political, social, cultural, and gender dynamics that shaped child-rearing practices and state interventions in family life. Understanding the professionalization of childcare requires examining developments from WWI to the present day. This allows for an examination of the diverse political and ideological regimes that have shaped the childcare field, as well as the memory politics that continue to influence its trajectory. In this way, particular emphasis is placed on the life and work of Emmi Pikler (1902–1984), a doctor and childcare specialist who influenced the evolution of infant care in post-WWII Hungary and established a highly successful international organization. Although Pikler was one of the most influential childcare experts in socialist Hungary, her life and work remain largely unexplored from an interdisciplinary perspective.

We invite researchers, historians, sociologists, psychologists, child welfare and care professionals to examine the historical development of infant and child care in Hungary, with a particular focus on Emmi Pikler’s work and the role of infant homes (csecsemőotthonok) in shaping child protection policies and the care of young children by families. The objective is to illuminate how child protection systems were shaped by social necessities and political aspirations, offering invaluable insights into the contemporary challenges in child welfare policy. Presentations that explore the political implications of child welfare policies, the interplay between government and society in child welfare, care, and protection, and the impact of ideologies on childcare systems are highly encouraged.

We welcome proposals that address, but are not limited to, the following topics:

Emmi Pikler’s Contributions and Political Context
Examination of Emmi Pikler’s work in the broader political and social context of 20th-century Hungary, including her influence on national child welfare and child protection policies and the support or resistance from political actors. The role of the „Lóczy” in sheltering the hidden infants of political prisoners in the 1950s.

The Functioning of Infant Homes and State Intervention
Historical analysis of how infant homes (csecsemőotthonok) were established and operated, focusing on the political motivations behind state intervention in family and child welfare, including the role of public institutions and the changing structure of out-of-home care of children from dominantly family-based foster care to institutional care.

Child-Rearing Ideologies
Exploration of how political ideologies (such as nationalism, socialism, or conservatism), traditions, and beliefs shaped child-rearing practices, especially concerning state-supported institutions for infant care and family-based care of young children.

Health and Welfare Policies in a Political Lens
Investigating the intersection between child health policies, welfare programs, and broader political agendas. How have political regimes from post-WWI Hungary to the present influenced healthcare, education, and welfare reforms for children and families?

Nation-Building and Childcare
The role of child-rearing practices and child protection policies in nation-building efforts, including how children were seen as future citizens and how infant care became part of political discourse on national strength and identity.

Women’s Roles and Gender Politics
The role of women, particularly mothers and caregivers, in the political discourse surrounding family and childcare. How did gender politics intersect with state policies on child welfare, and what have been the expectations placed on women influencing current policies and practices? How have professional and academic women influenced perceptions, policies, and practices, with particular attention to research and programs related to children, families, and women's roles?

The Politics of Poverty and Child Neglect
The state’s approach to dealing with child poverty and neglect including political debates around state, community versus family, and parental responsibility for children’s welfare and well-being. How did social class and political ideologies shape policies towards impoverished families and orphaned or abandoned children?

Comparative Political Perspectives
Comparative studies of how political regimes in Hungary and other European countries influenced establishing and managing infant homes and broader childcare policies.

Submission Guidelines

We invite individual papers or panel discussions. Proposals should include:
- Full name, institutional affiliation, and contact information of the presenter(s)
- Title of the presentation or panel
- Language of submission: Hungarian OR English
- A 300-word abstract outlining the research topic, methodology, and key findings or arguments
- Any specific AV or other technical requirements

All proposals should be sent to Mária Herczog (herczogmaria@me.com), Andrea Pető (petoa@ceu.edu) and Fanni Svégel (svegelfanni@gmail.com) as one Word (doc) or PDF file. Panel proposals should be sent as one merged file.

Important Dates
- Introductory roundtable discussing state-of-the-art research on 24th April, 2025 at CEU DI at 17CET in Hungarian
- Deadline for abstract submission: 1 May, 2025
- Notification of acceptance: 15 June, 2025
- Submission of papers: September 15, 2025
- Conference dates: October 6-8, 2025, at CEU DI

Venue: The conference will take place in Budapest, Hungary: CEU, with the support of Österreichische Kulturforum Budapest.

Outreach: The manuscripts will be published as an edited volume or a special issue.

Conveners: Mária Herczog, Andrea Pető and Fanni Svégel.

Conference in Bielefeld (Germany), 24-25 November 2025

Tagung „Nachtarbeit“ an der Universität Bielefeld in Kooperation mit der German Labour History Association: Nachtarbeit tritt in den unterschiedlichsten Branchen auf, dementsprechend viele Menschen müssen in den Abendstunden ihrem Beruf nachgehen. Betroffen sind nicht nur die Nachtarbeitenden selbst, auch das Umfeld ist gezwungen, sich dem Arbeitsrhythmus anzupassen. Gleichzeitig ist unser Zusammenleben auf diese Nacharbeit angewiesen. Trotzdem ist sie nach wie vor ein wenig erforschtes Feld der Labour History. Wir laden dazu ein, Beitragsvorschläge zu sozialen, kulturellen und wirtschaftlichen Aspekten der Nachtarbeit einzusenden.

Wenn der Tag zu Ende geht. Nachtarbeit seit dem 19. Jahrhundert

Tagung an der Universität Bielefeld, 24./25. November 2025

Ob Pflegerin im Krankenhaus, Portier im Hotel, Stahlarbeiter am Abstich oder Ingenieurin im Kraftwerk: Sie alle vereint die Notwendigkeit, nachts arbeiten zu müssen. Nachtarbeit gilt als eine Form atypischer Arbeitszeiten.

Die Gründe für diese Form des Arbeitens sind vielfältig und basieren auf technischen, wirt-schaftlichen, sozialen oder kulturellen Anforderungen. Letztere betreffen meist Berufe, die mit dem großstädtischen „Nachtleben“ verbunden sind wie Barkeeper:innen, Türsteher:innen oder auch Sexarbeiter:innen. Technisch bedingt ist kontinuierliche Schichtarbeit dann, wenn Pro-duktions- oder Arbeitsprozesse nicht unterbrochen werden können, wie etwa in der Chemiein-dustrie. Sozial notwendig ist Nachtarbeit etwa in Krankenhäusern und anderen Einrichtungen der öffentlichen Versorgung. Wirtschaftliche Ursachen finden sich in der Gewinnmaximierung, etwa durch längere Maschinenlaufzeiten.

Nachtarbeit tritt also in den unterschiedlichsten Branchen auf, dementsprechend viele Men-schen müssen in den Abendstunden ihrem Beruf nachgehen. Betroffen sind nicht nur die Nachtarbeitenden selbst, auch das Umfeld ist gezwungen, sich dem Arbeitsrhythmus anzu-passen. Gleichzeitig ist unser Zusammenleben auf diese Nacharbeit angewiesen. Trotzdem ist sie nach wie vor ein wenig erforschtes Feld der Labour History.

Ob und in welcher Weise die Arbeit „gegen die Uhr“ thematisiert wird, hängt stark von Fakto-ren wie Branche, gewerkschaftlicher Repräsentation, politischem System und sozioökonomi-schen Status der Betroffenen ab. So war es etwa in der Bundesrepublik gesellschaftlich ak-zeptiert, dass Kellnerinnen bis spät in die Nacht arbeiteten. Industriearbeiterinnen war genau dieses hingegen bis 1992 verboten. In der DDR war zeitgleich die Nacharbeit von Frauen poli-tisch wie wirtschaftlich erwünscht.

Wir laden dazu ein, Beitragsvorschläge zu sozialen, kulturellen und wirtschaftlichen Aspekten der Nachtarbeit einzusenden. Es bieten sich eine ganze Reihe von Komplexen an, die auf der Tagung behandelt werden können:
- Fallbeispiele für unterschiedliche Formen von Nachtarbeit
- Organisation und Regulierung von Nachtarbeit in unterschiedlichen Staaten und/oder Branchen
- ihre Verwissenschaftlichung im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert
- Repräsentation und Erfahrung von Nachtarbeit
- ihre technische und bauliche Bedingtheit (künstliche Beleuchtung etc.)
- ihre räumliche und regionale Dimension

Wir freuen uns ferner über Vorträge, die Geschlechter- und Klassenzugehörigkeiten oder Mig-rationserfahrungen in den Mittelpunkt stellen. Auch ist es denkbar, dass Beitragende den Wert von Arbeit sowie Humanisierungsmöglichkeiten- und grenzen in ihre Überlegungen aufneh-men. Welche Rolle spielten Gesundheit und Krankheit für Nachtarbeitende? Wie sah ihr Ver-hältnis zu Freizeit aus?

Beitragsvorschläge im Umfang von 1.500 bis 2.000 Zeichen in deutscher Sprache sowie eine Kurz-Biografie werden bis zum 1. Mai 2025 an anna.horstmann@uni-bielefeld.de erbeten. Eine Benachrichtigung über die Auswahl erfolgt bis Mitte Juni 2025. Die Tagung wird am 24./25. November 2025 an der Universität Bielefeld stattfinden. Wir erstatten die Reisekosten und stellen eine Übernachtungsmöglichkeit.

Tagung an der Universität Bielefeld in Kooperation mit der German Labour History Associati-on: Nachtarbeit tritt in den unterschiedlichsten Branchen auf, dementsprechend viele Men-schen müssen in den Abendstunden ihrem Beruf nachgehen. Betroffen sind nicht nur die Nachtarbeitenden selbst, auch das Umfeld ist gezwungen, sich dem Arbeitsrhythmus anzu-passen. Gleichzeitig ist unser Zusammenleben auf diese Nacharbeit angewiesen. Trotzdem ist sie nach wie vor ein wenig erforschtes Feld der Labour History – das möchte diese Tagung ändern. Wir laden dazu ein, Beitragsvorschläge zu sozialen, kulturellen und wirtschaftlichen Aspekten der Nachtarbeit einzusenden.

Luxembourg

Since the 1970s, deindustrialization has fundamentally changed Western industrial societies. In North America and Europe, traditional industrial regions lost thousands of jobs – in particular the textile industry, coal mining, the iron and steel industry and shipbuilding. Even in the production of electronic consumer goods or in the watch and photography industries many millions of jobs were cut or relocated to other regions of the world. In fact, deindustrialization needs to be conceived of as one of the most far-reaching transformation processes in contemporary history, fundamentally changing landscapes, economic structures and socio-cultural environments.

Starting from this observation, the conference, organized by the CONDE research group, will reflect on the impact and wider historical reverberations of deindustrialization in Europe from the 1970s. While deindustrialization was initially addressed mainly by the social sciences, in recent years historians have increasingly come in and pointed out the complexity of the historical phenomenon. In contrast to economic concepts such as "restructuring" or "downsizing", which could not adequately capture societal and social change, a historical approach to deindustrialization allows to cover, first, the economic development of production, turnover and sales, second, the political shaping of the policy field, third, the cultural ramifications and, forth, a perspective from below, which takes into account personal memories of workers, the dissolution of traditional social and cultural communities or changes in social spaces.

The conference will focus on the European particularities of deindustrialization since the 1970s – in Western and Eastern Europe, in an East-West comparison over the epochal year 1989/90 and in terms of entanglements among European states and beyond. What distinguished Europe from the US and Canada, from the North American experience of deindustrialization? In how far differed the variety of European reactions to deindustrialization from each other? Did the Cold War resonate in deindustrialization policies, in the ensuing political mobilization or in personal experiences? In which way did deindustrialization leave its mark on the co-transformation process after 1989/90 both in the former East and West? Last but not least: is it possible at all to conceive of ‘European’ deindustrialization? The conference aims at widening our understanding of deindustrialization and its multidimensional impact on European politics and societies in the period of its most recent history.

Guests are invited to attend the conference at their own expense; they should register in advance with Tessy Delledera (tessy.delledera@uni.lu).

Programme

Wednesday, 25 June

13.30-14.00 Arrival of participants (coffee and tea)

14.00-14.10 Welcome
Andreas Fickers (Luxembourg)
Andreas Wirsching (Munich)

14.10-14.30 Introduction
Stefan Krebs (Luxembourg), Christian Marx (Munich) and Martina Steber (Munich)

14.30-16.00 Panel 1: Industrial Production in Deindustrializing Economies
Chair: Christian Kleinschmidt (Marburg)

Christian Marx (Munich): Diverging Paths after the Boom: Deindustrialization in the German Household Appliance Industry (1960–2000s)

Anna Calori (Glasgow): The Steady Stream? De-industrialization and Re-industrialization in the Petro-Chemical Industry in Yugoslavia and Italy

Nicolas Arendt (Luxembourg): ARBED’s Takeover of the former VEB Maxhütte Unterwellenborn 1992-2001: The "last remaining island of socialism"?

16.00-16.30 Coffee and Tea

16.30-18.00 Panel 2: Deindustrialization and the Environment
Chair: Sabine Pitteloud (Brig)

Mauro Elli (Milan): Nuclear Deindustrialization? Italy’s Experience in the Long Decommissioning (1970s–1990s)

Riyoko Shibe (Glasgow): Deindustrialization of the Scottish Petrochemical Industry and the Experience of Noxiousness: BP Chemicals in Grangemouth from 1970 to 2000

Philipp Kröger (Siegen): From Fordist to Post-Fordist Nature? Landscape Planning and the Management of Urban Nature in Hamburg, 1960s–1980s

18.00-19.00 Keynote Lecture
Chair: Martina Steber (Munich)

Dietmar Süß (Augsburg): „Barbarisation of Social Conflict“? Work, Recognition, and Vulnerability in the History of Deindustrialization

19.30 Conference Dinner

Thursday, 26 June

08.45-09.45 Kick-off Lecture
Stefan Berger (Bochum): Deindustrialization in a Global Perspective

09.45-10.45 Panel 3: Spaces of Deindustrialization
Chair: Emmanuel Droit (Strasbourg)

Pascal Raggi (Nancy): The Deindustrialization of the Lorraine du fer and Luxembourg from a Comparative Perspective

Jan Kellershohn (Halle): Contested Spaces of Decline: Deindustrialization in the Ruhr and in the Central German Industrial Region

10.45-11.15 Coffee and Tea

11.15-12.15 Panel 4: The International Politics of Deindustrialization
Chair: Benoît Majerus (Luxembourg)

Maria Adamopoulou (Bucharest): ‘Ceilings of Tolerance’: Deindustrialization and Labour Migration in the EEC in the 1970s

Mathieu Dubois (Rennes): European Trade Act or open Single Market? Devising a European Response to Deindustrialization in the early 1980s

12.15-13.15 Lunch

13.15-15.00 Visit of blast furnace A on the campus of the University of Luxembourg

15.00-16.30 Panel 5: Deindustrialization and Gender Orders
Chair: Jackie Clarke (Glasgow)

Helena Schwinghammer (Munich): A Silent Farewell: The Deindustrialization of a German Textile Region (1970-2008)

Stefan Hördler (Göttingen): The Intertwined History of Male Unemployment and Women’s Initiatives: Scenarios of Decline and Socio-Economic Consequences in the Steel Industry since the 1980s

Nora Küttel (Bremen): Shifting Tides: Gendered Impacts of Deindustrialization of East German Shipbuilding

16.30-17.00 Coffee and Tea

17.00-18.30 Memories of Deindustrialization: Film Screening and Round Table Discussion

Film Screening: “Identity Disputes. The Image of Life in the Minett”, Boretska/Schönfelder 2022

Round Table Discussion with Denis Scuto (Luxembourg), Jörg Arnold (Munich) and Joanna Wawrzyniak (Warsaw)

18.30 Reception (food and drinks)

Friday, 27 June

08.30-09.30 Panel 6: Deindustrialization and the European Welfare State
Chair: Christoph Brüll (Luxembourg)

Jonas Fey (Bonn): Deindustrialization and Adult Education in Germany since the 1970s: Politics, Participation and Effects

Zoé Konsbruck (Luxembourg): Steel Towns and Crisis Management: The Dynamics between Industrial Towns and the ‘Luxembourg Model’ during the 1975-1985 Steel Crisis

09.30-10.00 Coffee and Tea

10.00-11.30 Panel 7: Migration and Race in Deindustrializing Societies
Chair: Machteld Venken (Luxembourg)

Christopher Lawson (Berkeley): No Going Back: Deindustrialization, Decolonisation, and the Remaking of Urban Communities in Western Europe

Paroma Ghose (Munich): “Quand la justice slalome”: Sounding Deindustrialization through French Rap Narratives (1981-Present)

Herrick Chapman (New York) & Lizabeth Cohen (Cambridge/MA): Surviving Deindustrialization as Ethnic and Racial Minorities

11.30-12.00 Concluding Remarks
Chair: Stefan Krebs (Luxembourg) and Christian Marx (Munich)

Conference in Herne (Germany), 16-17 October 2025

The DGO Annual Conference aims to discuss the dynamics of property relations from a historical perspective, considering their long-term consequences and adopting a comparative approach, beyond the narrower legal and economic history. It seeks to address this research gap and invites approximately 15 speakers, who may also contribute to a subsequent joint publication.

DGO Annual Conference

Property relations are not merely the economic foundation, but also a fundamental social, political, and ideological problem of societies and states. They also shape cultural frameworks. Changes in property ownership serve both as catalysts and indicators of political and social transformation. This is particularly evident in Eastern Europe during the "Age of Extremes" (Hobsbawm), where land reforms, expropriations, and restitutions have marked the various phases of transition from one political and social system to another.

The DGO Annual Conference aims to discuss the dynamics of property relations from a historical perspective, considering their long-term consequences and adopting a comparative approach, beyond the narrower legal and economic history. It seeks to address this research gap and invites approximately 15 speakers, who may also contribute to a subsequent joint publication. Possible core themes of discussion include:

a) Temporalities: What is the temporal relationship between property change and political or social transformation? Did ownership change trigger broader transitions, or did it follow them? Can we identify patterns of causation and delayed effects?

b) Property change in times of crisis and war: How did transformations in property ownership unfold during wars, revolutions, and economic crises? What strategies did individuals and groups develop to protect or reclaim property? What role did transitional justice and restitution measures play after regime changes?

c) Policies of property transformation: How did political and social transformations shape policies regarding property change? To what extent did such policies accelerate broader societal changes?

d) Legal and institutional dimensions: How have legal frameworks and institutions structured property changes? To what extent were new property regimes stabilized or challenged through legal reforms, court rulings, or administrative practices? Were there informal or alternative ownership structures beyond state-defined property regimes?

e) Property change and inequality: How did shifts in ownership affect economic disparities? Who benefits from property reforms, and who loses? What is the mutual relationship between property change and ethnic and religious majorities and minorities? Can specific national or ethnic groups be identified as primary targets of property redistribution, and were they strengthened or weakened by these processes?
f) Property and gender: How did legal reforms, regime changes, and codifications (e.g., marriage law, inheritance law, property law, procedural law) affect women’s and marginalized gender groups’ access to property in Eastern Europe? In which historical conjunctures were women excluded from property ownership, and when were they empowered? What role did family structures and social norms play in regulating female property rights?

g) Migration and property change: Were there specific social groups (e.g., smallholders, ethnic minorities) particularly affected by migration due to property changes? How did remittances or the return of migrants influence property ownership in their regions of origin?

h) Experience and memory of property change: How did the experience of property transformation shape societies? How do societies and individuals remember changes in ownership? Is property change part of cultural memory and historical narratives?

i) Ecological aspects of property change: How did property transformations affect land use through nationalization or privatization? What environmental consequences arose from industrialization and deindustrialization? How do property rights intersect with environmental protection? How was resource management affected in regions with large state-owned or collective enterprises?

This conference aims to foster a broad and interdisciplinary discussion of property transformations in Eastern Europe, examining their multifaceted implications from a comparative and historical perspective.

For the 44th issue of the Yearbook of Women’s History (guest editors: Lidewij Tummers and María Novas), we invite contributions that explore feminist architectural practices in past and present – whether through built projects, design approaches, or biographies. How have feminist frameworks (re)shaped our understanding of architecture and urban planning? How were women involved in the making of houses, institutional buildings such as asylums, schools, prisons, monasteries, shops, markets, governmental buildings? Whose stories remain untold, and what can we learn from them?

Yearbook for Women's History: Feminism and the making of the built environment from past to present

Gender theorists and activists often highlight the historical notion that “cities are made by men.” But is this entirely true? Or does this perspective omit and erase critical aspects of history? The scarcity of women in the architectural canon compels us to ask: why is this the case? What were – and are – the institutional gatekeepers that systematically excluded women, people of colour, and other marginalized groups from the proverbial drawing board, nowadays and in the past? Recent research into these questions has uncovered a wealth of historical information that challenges the supposed absence of women and other marginalized groups from architectural history and theory.

Feminist critiques of urban planning and development from the 1980s and 1990s exposed how the built environment often failed to accommodate everyday practices tied to female roles. This failure was largely attributed to the lack of female representation in planning structures. But feminism is about more than simply the presence of women. It is a critical lens and theoretical framework through which the nature and impact of gender inequality can be explored. As such, feminist architecture challenges entrenched norms and reimagines how spaces are designed and inhabited. Starting from this premise, the Yearbook of Women’s History aims to examine how the built environment was shaped within and beyond the confines of architects' offices. How have local authorities, clients, building firms, activist organizations, and knowledge institutions been influenced by feminist ideas, intersectional perspectives, or decolonial thought on architecture? How have feminist contributions influenced the development of buildings, districts, and entire cities? And in what ways were such perspectives excluded or ignored?

For the 44th issue of the Yearbook of Women’s History (guest editors: Lidewij Tummers and María Novas), we invite contributions that explore feminist architectural practices in past and present – whether through built projects, design approaches, or biographies. How have feminist frameworks (re)shaped our understanding of architecture and urban planning? How were women involved in the making of houses, institutional buildings such as asylums, schools, prisons, monasteries, shops, markets, governmental buildings? Whose stories remain untold, and what can we learn from them?

CALL FOR PAPERS
We are looking for articles that vary in length (3000-6000 words). We will also consider experimental pieces – poems, short explorations, visual essays, and creative interventions. We welcome contributions that employ different perspectives and scales of analysis from all over the world. We invite authors from academia, museums and cultural and heritage institutions, NGOs, and activist organisations. We welcome contributions from a wide range of disciplines, including but not limited to architecture, history, cultural studies, anthropology, and social and cultural geography.

Abstracts of 200-300 words are to be submitted by 1 May 2025 to jaarboekvrouwengeschiedenis@gmail.com.

Lidewij Tummers, Feminist Architect and Researcher
María Novas, Senior Lecturer and Scientific Researcher, ETH Zürich

Tentative timeline:
1 May 2025: Deadline for abstracts
30 May 2025: Information concerning acceptance sent to the writers
15 September 2025: Submission deadline for articles to be submitted to peer review
February/March 2026: Revised articles due
April/May 2026: Copy-editing
September 2026: Publication

25-28 August 2025, Conference in Bologna (Italy)

 

Dear colleagues,

we are excited to invite your contributions to our section at the Annula Conference of the European International Studies Association 2025 in Bologna:

"(Post-)Socialist Internationalism: Witnessing, Theorizing, and (Re-)Crafting International Relations of the Global East."

Best regards,
Maria Ketzmerick-Calandrino & Luis Aue

(Post-)Socialist Internationalism: Witnessing, Theorizing, and (Re-)Crafting International Relations of the Global East

This section explores the legacies and transformations of socialist internationalism and its relevance today. We welcome paper and panel proposals on themes such as:

- Socialist worldmaking and alternative internationalisms
- Post-socialist transitions and their global entanglements
- Solidarity movements across and beyond the Global East

If you have ideas for roundtables or other formats, we'd love to hear them! Let's rethink the Global East together—submit your proposals via the EISA website: https://eisa-net.org/pec-2025/

The deadline for submissions is March 20 2025.